“Criticism, like rain, should be gentle enough to nourish a man’s growth without destroying his roots.”
― Frank A. Clark
On Tuesday 6th February we ran a workshop on how to give a critique. Kathy Joy, who runs her own critique business called Fine Tune Your Fiction, walked us through the process.
First, we discussed constructive criticism.
Kathy defined constructive criticism as having 5 main characteristics:
- It is specific – it clearly states what the problem is, and why it is a problem.
- It presents solutions instead of problems.
- It focuses on the work not the author.
- It is never personal.
- It makes no assumptions.
In addition, Kathy explained that these rules applied to both positive and negative criticism. Positive praise that is not specific and does not explain exactly what was so good and why is empty praise, which is a form of destructive criticism.
Next, the group was walked through how to assess a manuscript and give a critique in four simple stages:
- First, the group was asked to read through the work. No markings or notes were allowed – the task was simply to take in the story and become familiar with what was happening, who the characters were, where it was set, and so on.
- The second stage was using a red pen to highlight any weaker areas, but also be able to explain specifically what wasn’t working, and why.
- The third stage was using a blue pen to highlight stronger areas. Once again attendees had to zero in on the specifics – what was good and why.
- The final stage was to pick a single weak area and suggest a way to resolve it. This was the first and crucial stage to giving a critique.
“The most important part of any critique is to ensure your suggestions are not how you would do it if you were writing it, because it’s not your work. An editor’s job is not to impose their style on other authors but instead to cultivate an author’s voice, to refine it. To do this, you must look at the work and try to understand what the author was trying to do and think of a more effective way to achieve it that fits the existing content.”
Everyone managed to highlight a specific weak area and most could come up with a possible solution to it.
Overall the workshop went exceptionally well, with everyone learning something new, which can be applied going forward.
“Much like how reading more helps you become a better writer, so does learning to critique. Seeking out strengths and weaknesses in the work of others makes you more sensitive to it in your own work.”
The NWC would like to thank everyone who attended.We would also like to thank Kathy for walking us through the process of analysing work and offering effective, constructive criticism.